PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
9.72%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.53%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.21%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-51.48%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-56.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
37.56%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
18.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 12.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
4.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 4.71%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
58.74%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
56.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 75.56%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
14.75%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 84.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
136.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
100.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 158.54%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
26.23%
Below 50% of AMD's 439.05%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
4.46%
Below 50% of AMD's 125.82%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-16.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 11520.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 412.84%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
647.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 647.52% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
165.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 165.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.30% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.53%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.10%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 7.54%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.08%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.98%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
6.76%
Debt growth far above AMD's 2.04%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-2.33%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 11.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.21%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.