PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.85%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 44.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.82%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 45.05%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
23.29%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 136.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 159.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 148.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.65%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 153.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 146.15%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 0.66%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.13%
Dividend growth of 0.13% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-16.10%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 39.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.43%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 74.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
31.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1.85%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
23.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 71.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 48.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
41.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 260.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.88%
Below 50% of AMD's 472.18%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-9.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 330.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
103.37%
Below 50% of AMD's 294.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
88.52%
Below 50% of AMD's 228.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.44%
Below 50% of AMD's 436.35%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
7.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 270.54%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-7.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 845.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.37%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 523.86%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
644.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 644.90% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
163.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 163.60% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.57% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
18.37%
AR growth well above AMD's 19.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.37%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AMD's 6.68%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
8.79%
50-75% of AMD's 16.24%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.01%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.85%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 10.43%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
1.50%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 26.98%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.