205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.26%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 11.26%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.32%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 14.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.90%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.24%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.09%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.20%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Share reduction while AMD is at 17.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.43%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 15.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-17.54%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 106.92%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
52.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 224.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
44.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 201.49%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
224.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 472.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
108.31%
Below 50% of AMD's 822.56%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
0.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 2338.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
536.51%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 439.27%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
134.40%
Below 50% of AMD's 707.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
78.80%
Below 50% of AMD's 800.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.50%
Below 50% of AMD's 2104.67%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.19%
Below 50% of AMD's 7451.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
69.13%
Below 50% of AMD's 1945.11%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
573.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 573.58% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 129.97% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
49.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.53% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.01%
AR growth well above AMD's 10.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.75%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 8.93%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.19%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 0.88%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.86%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.43%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 48.31%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.88%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 22.64%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.