PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 6.61%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 11.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.20%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 264.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.95%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 647.22%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.99%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 115.45%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.65%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 128.57%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
54.47%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.82%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
319.48%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 15.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
36.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 76.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 168.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
138.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 1020.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-10.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 1292.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
93.78%
Below 50% of AMD's 420.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-11.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 433.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-40.93%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
93.15%
Below 50% of AMD's 4805.79%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
108.41%
Below 50% of AMD's 1994.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
56.21%
Below 50% of AMD's 491.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
330.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.83% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.63% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
27.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 27.31% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 13.89%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.56%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 7.29%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.47%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.14%
Under 50% of AMD's 6.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 3.80%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.20%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 7.08%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.