PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.47%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 12.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.47%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-11.63%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 19.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.39%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 20.30%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.53%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.56%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.11%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
4.58%
Dividend growth of 4.58% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.36%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 106.85%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
93.75%
FCF growth 75-90% of AMD's 119.96%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
40.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 191.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 163.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 20.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
80.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 428.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.53%
Below 50% of AMD's 115.19%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-14.12%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 19.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
67.62%
Below 50% of AMD's 162.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
15.21%
Below 50% of AMD's 107.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-42.90%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
86.70%
Below 50% of AMD's 14428.00%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
94.14%
Below 50% of AMD's 1391.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
28.44%
Below 50% of AMD's 482.13%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
299.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.73% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
50.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 50.84% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
18.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.30% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-7.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.38%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 6.70%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.53%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.01%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.71%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.20%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 9.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.