205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.62%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
67.84%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
67.84%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.02%
Positive net income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.89%
Positive EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.42%
Share count expansion well above AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.65%
Slight or no buyback while AVGO is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.70%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
107.56%
OCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 7.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
304.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.62%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 409.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AVGO's 122.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AVGO stands at 60.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 73.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
99.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
308.53%
Below 50% of AVGO's 691.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
184.44%
Below 50% of AVGO's 651.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.95%
Below 50% of AVGO's 66.58%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AVGO's 147.32%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
60.15%
Below 50% of AVGO's 188.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
91.48%
Below 50% of AVGO's 1441.93%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
8.57%
Below 50% of AVGO's 71.80%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 38.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
4.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AVGO's 14.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.16%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 5.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.34%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.97%
Positive BV/share change while AVGO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-14.52%
We’re deleveraging while AVGO stands at 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.15%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AVGO's 19.53%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AVGO's 14.12%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.