PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 3.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
171.79%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-1233.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1233.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-700.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-445.24%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-445.24%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
223.77%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
34.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 66.57%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-169.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
52.64%
Below 50% of INTC's 142.56%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
52.64%
Below 50% of INTC's 142.56%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
31.37%
Below 50% of INTC's 150.60%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.45%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 5.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-3.32%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.34%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 26.26%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.