PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.77%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.40%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
45.05%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
45.05%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
28.03%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.08%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-5.09%
Share reduction while INTC is at 16.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.09%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 16.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-29.19%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-105.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1.87%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
44.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 211.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 203.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 27.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-921.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-229.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
577.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 577.65% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
527.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 527.45% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.20%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.72%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.68%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 4.19%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
15.26%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.56%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.90%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.