PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
223.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.15%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.96%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.15%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
24.78%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.80%
EPS growth of 37.80% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
37.80%
Diluted EPS growth of 37.80% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
14.90%
Share change of 14.90% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
14.90%
Diluted share change of 14.90% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-75.13%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
35000.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 23.08%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
321.90%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.48%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
28.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 210.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 180.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 39.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-387.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-184.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
21.11%
Below 50% of INTC's 154.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1.73%
Below 50% of INTC's 186.96%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 79.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-15.75%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.75%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.02% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.12%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.55%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.73%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-20.60%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.73%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 3.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 6.30%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.