Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 30.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.

Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 86.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 86.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 77.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.

EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 50.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.

Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 50.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.

Share change of 19.32% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.

Diluted share change of 19.32% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.

Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 184.77%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.

FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 766.83%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.

10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 433.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 181.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 69.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 89.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of INTC's 184.69%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of INTC's 249.99%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 261.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 74.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 10.17%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

We have a declining book value while INTC shows 7.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.