PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.18%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 8.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-54.96%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 14.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.89%
EBIT growth 50-75% of INTC's 33.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
23.89%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 33.97%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
5.19%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 27.86%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.97%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 17.74%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.97%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 17.74%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-10.10%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-70.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-120.49%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
36.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 467.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
10.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 141.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 52.99%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 201.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
616.08%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 616.08% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-18.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
456.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 157.67%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 33.94% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-18.09%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.28%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.50%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.75%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 12.17%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.80%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.91%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.