PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
21.62%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
67.84%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
67.84%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.02%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.89%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.42%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.65%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.70%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
107.56%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
304.55%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
50.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 984.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 268.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 130.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 380.39%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
99.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 171.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
308.53%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 308.53% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
184.44%
Below 50% of INTC's 528.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
29.95%
Below 50% of INTC's 174.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
Below 50% of INTC's 201.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
60.15%
Below 50% of INTC's 123.45%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.57% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
86.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 108.73%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
4.12%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.16%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 5.10%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.97%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.93%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-14.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.15%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.67%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 1.59%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.