PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.42%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.96%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.65%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
21.82%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.86%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.45%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.55%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-7.44%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
71.52%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 159.02%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
221.43%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 173.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
2.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 601.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-18.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 167.27%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-10.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 51.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
Below 50% of INTC's 695.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
212.82%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 138.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
309.18%
Below 50% of INTC's 1394.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
90.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 131.03%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
346.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 18.31%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
112.72%
Below 50% of INTC's 793.07%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
143.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 236.63%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
73.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 107.62%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
74.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 74.53% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
31.98%
Below 50% of INTC's 313.51%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-9.70%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 157.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
16.07%
AR growth well above INTC's 7.01%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.29%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
19.47%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 18.71%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
12.42%
75-90% of INTC's 14.05%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
16.35%
Debt growth far above INTC's 30.84%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-4.11%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 14.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
10.71%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.03%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.