PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.23%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 3.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.32%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.79%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 79.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.79%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 79.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
40.61%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.67%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-6.67%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
7.15%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.10%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-43.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.98%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 2876.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-22.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 451.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-30.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 34.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23879.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 528.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
98.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 30.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-44.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-166.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
283.66%
Below 50% of INTC's 727.00%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
154.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 152.85%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
78.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 64.50%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-68.64%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
1.81%
Below 50% of INTC's 247.01%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
1.65%
Below 50% of INTC's 169.68%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-13.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 4.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-16.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.32%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.53%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-13.11%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-22.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.