PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.24%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
47.23%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
83.58%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 30.46%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
83.58%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 30.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
67.24%
Net income growth at 75-90% of INTC's 85.71%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
72.41%
EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
72.41%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
18.75%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
18.75%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.13%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-13.45%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-67.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-45.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 401.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-35.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 3.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1782.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 435.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-18.33%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
14.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-148.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 366.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-123.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-112.54%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
216.59%
Below 50% of INTC's 602.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
124.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 105.47%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
49.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 44.25%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-27.60%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-7.16%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 220.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 98.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.26%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 10.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.26%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 10.08%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.53%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-16.01%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.24%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 1.17%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.57%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 3.15%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-11.96%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.