205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 5.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.54%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.98%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.98%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.66%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 8.48%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
32.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.11%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.11%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.93%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.79%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
86.17%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
308.00%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 222.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
102.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 604.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
72.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 62.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
158.75%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 215.04%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
36.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 36.37%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
564.91%
Below 50% of INTC's 1794.86%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
285.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 359.61%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
58.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
7.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 12.11%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
39.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 1002.33%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
5.99%
Below 50% of INTC's 166.58%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 97.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
AR growth well above INTC's 2.61%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.53%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.54%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.12%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-51.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.03%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.93%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.