PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.98%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.85%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
55.96%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
34.61%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
52.80%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
58.33%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
58.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-4.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.68%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
58.13%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
131.71%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-8.26%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 174.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
19.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 21.46%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
74.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 58.76%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
93.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 329.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
35.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 2.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
148.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 91.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
107.17%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 168.08%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-49.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
669.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 396.59%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
195.47%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 307.72%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-5.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 12.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
17.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 14.89%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
63.48%
Below 50% of INTC's 2180.13%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
26.48%
Below 50% of INTC's 438.42%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
9.16%
Below 50% of INTC's 299.83%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
12.15%
AR growth well above INTC's 6.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.45%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.31%
Under 50% of INTC's 0.83%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.22%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 9.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.45%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.