205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.22%
Revenue growth similar to INTC's 17.01%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
31.76%
Gross profit growth similar to INTC's 32.48%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
80.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 21591.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
122.45%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 21591.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
106.92%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 566.33%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
104.76%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 578.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
110.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 564.14%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.95%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.23%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
49.73%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.29%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
19.45%
FCF growth 50-75% of INTC's 27.30%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
61.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 53.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
22.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 27.61%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-8.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 11.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
110.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.72%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
22.04%
Below 50% of INTC's 45.39%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
138.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 49.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
79.23%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 52.89%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
31.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-8.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 48.64%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
59.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 60.64%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
0.89%
Below 50% of INTC's 17.66%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-5.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 16.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
460.05%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 835.33%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
428.42%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 250.86%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
260.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.22%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
15.35%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.49%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.99%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.41%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 3.94%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.98%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.