PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.63%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.29%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.86%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.12%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.26%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.02%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
13.02%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-8.03%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-10.39%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 8.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
70.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 102.45%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
29.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 61.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
3.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 12.76%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
60.55%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 85.12%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
50.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 96.32%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
42.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
177.33%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 127.62%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
49.47%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 85.83%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
200.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.90%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
31.01%
Below 50% of INTC's 91.14%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
26.82%
Below 50% of INTC's 55.16%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2.97%
Below 50% of INTC's 29.44%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1232.73%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 459.95%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
183.53%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.98%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
100.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.28%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-15.64%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 21.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.88%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 3.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.99%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-6.33%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 5.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-7.34%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.