PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
4.57%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-1.29%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
17.55%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.84%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.61%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.70%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.54%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
102.12%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 81.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
130.43%
FCF growth 75-90% of INTC's 168.13%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
22.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 140.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 67.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 48.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
303.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 319.32%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
136.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 263.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
103.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 162.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
136.66%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 131.67%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
123.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 111.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
41.81%
Below 50% of INTC's 101.67%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3.34%
Below 50% of INTC's 134.39%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-15.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 59.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 32.56%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
638.34%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 109.60%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
162.46%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.22%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
79.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.93%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-10.64%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.64%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 3.27%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.45%
Under 50% of INTC's 7.91%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
3.76%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.53%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 2.41%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-3.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.