PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.65%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.94%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.77%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.77%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.76%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.68%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.10%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-26.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.60%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 117.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
92.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
131.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.66%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
15.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 20.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
812.98%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
520.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
63.37%
Below 50% of INTC's 138.10%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
53.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 66.50%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
68.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
487.06%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 62.10%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
99.82%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.79%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
37.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.78%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-7.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
14.68%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.06%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.41%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 4.15%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.26%
Under 50% of INTC's 3.03%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
14.39%
Debt growth far above INTC's 6.40%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.70%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 3.77%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-0.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.