PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 10.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 15.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.82%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 30.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.96%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 30.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 153.70%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.53%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 153.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 153.03%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.67%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
20.60%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 257.31%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-126.40%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 66.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
21.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
41.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
152.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-17.95%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
216.94%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
31.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
25.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
74.95%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 123.34%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
61.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 60.32%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
110.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
342.27%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
99.75%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
37.90%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
4.21%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.41%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.88%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.46%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 3.36%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
10.79%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.84%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.74%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.