205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
7.84%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.84%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-34.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.64%
Slight or no buybacks while LSCC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.64%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
8.00%
Dividend growth of 8.00% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 21.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 106.98% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
291.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
291.16%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.