205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.26%
Revenue growth similar to LSCC's 3.18%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
3.26%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of LSCC's 3.70%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
3.26%
Positive EBIT growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.26%
Positive operating income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.82%
Positive net income growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Slight or no buybacks while LSCC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while LSCC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.18%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
15.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 21.22%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
15.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 106.98% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
165.52%
Positive short-term CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.