PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 6.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.00%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
12.50%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
3.57%
Net income growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 5.00%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
-9.17%
Negative EPS growth while LSCC is at 528.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while LSCC is at 528.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.70%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.70%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.88%
Dividend growth of 12.88% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-90.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-135.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 132.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 132.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 132.64%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.82%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 21.05%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.20%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 3.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.63%
Under 50% of LSCC's 3.88%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
18.67%
We have some new debt while LSCC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while LSCC invests at 9.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.