PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 2.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
11.13%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.01%
EBIT growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.41%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.01%
Operating income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 6.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 7.02%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.00%
EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 50.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of LSCC's 50.38%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
8.46%
Share count expansion well above LSCC's 0.71%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.46%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 0.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-11.64%
Dividend reduction while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
10.43%
Positive OCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 435.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 435.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 73.45%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
250.38%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 250.38% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
41.03%
Net income/share CAGR of 41.03% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LSCC's 69.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LSCC is at 75.34%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.00% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-7.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while LSCC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.12%
AR growth well above LSCC's 5.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth of 13.04% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.03%
We have a declining book value while LSCC shows 6.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.44%
Debt growth of 0.44% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
SG&A growth of 4.27% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.