PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Revenue growth under 50% of LSCC's 27.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of LSCC's 35.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of LSCC's 228.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of LSCC's 228.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 97.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while LSCC is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 34.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
17.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LSCC's 20.18%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
133.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 579.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
87.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 173.01%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
49.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 150.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
106.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
120.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LSCC's 199.93%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
49.13%
Below 50% of LSCC's 350.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
15.89%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
13.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.63%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 378.03% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 200.44% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 43.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
6.16%
We show growth while LSCC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of LSCC's 8.44%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
Under 50% of LSCC's 4.36%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. LSCC's 16.14%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.16%
SG&A declining or stable vs. LSCC's 16.01%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.