PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.77%
Negative revenue growth while LSCC stands at 13.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.59%
Negative gross profit growth while LSCC is at 8.22%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.18%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-29.11%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-28.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.43%
Share reduction while LSCC is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above LSCC's 0.55%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.43%
Dividend growth of 0.43% while LSCC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-58.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-65.34%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.42%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to LSCC's 38.67%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
17.88%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSCC's 42.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
557.38%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.82%
Below 50% of LSCC's 128.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-8.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
339.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
54.62%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1404.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
14.40%
Below 50% of LSCC's 427.45%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
23.29%
Positive growth while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
27.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while LSCC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 15.74%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
526.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.91% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
332.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.92% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
30.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.81% while LSCC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.29%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. LSCC's 21.16%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.39%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 1.97%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.68%
Negative asset growth while LSCC invests at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.75%
50-75% of LSCC's 2.87%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.65%
R&D dropping or stable vs. LSCC's 28.51%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
1.54%
SG&A growth well above LSCC's 2.58%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.