205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.32%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.87%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-72.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-51.78%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-53.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-49.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-49.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.66%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 24.40%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
329.17%
OCF growth of 329.17% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
25.90%
FCF growth of 25.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
53.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 233.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
582.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 582.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-38.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
392.80%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
140.03%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-41.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.92%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
71.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 133.09%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
104.00%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-78.68%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
15.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 99.66%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-3.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.30%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.11%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
14.36%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.29%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.26%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.82%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.