PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.31%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 4.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
3.64%
Gross profit growth similar to MPWR's 3.62%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
12.92%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.33%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
34.92%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-29.56%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-27.87%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
41.96%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 24.40%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-48.82%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-112.03%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
3.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-24.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-27.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 40.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
385.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 385.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
143.28%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
73.69%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
49.68%
Below 50% of MPWR's 133.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
83.48%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
77.18%
Below 50% of MPWR's 181.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-2.22%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.14%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.88%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.20%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
45.27%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-3.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-1.52%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.