205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.40%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-29.55%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-62.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-62.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-63.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-65.79%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-64.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.06%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-12.19%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.02%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-81.83%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-145.60%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
9.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 574.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-19.03%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 233.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
1.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 40.56%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
72.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.96% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
241.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 241.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
333.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 333.18% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
403.33%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1299.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
20.89%
Below 50% of MPWR's 314.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1743.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 13.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
305.24%
Below 50% of MPWR's 692.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
163.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 274.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
91.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 133.09%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.40%
Below 50% of MPWR's 673.26%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-0.94%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 181.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-1.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 99.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-11.62%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.30%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.70%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 4.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.20%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.09%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.13%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 4.38%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-13.22%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 13.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.