PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.54%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 25.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.90%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 44.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-38.53%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 31.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-38.53%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 31.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-413.30%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-427.27%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 41.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-427.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 42.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-4.63%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.93%
Dividend growth of 3.93% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
31.68%
OCF growth of 31.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
71.62%
FCF growth of 71.62% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-5.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
85.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.67% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
50.12%
OCF/share CAGR of 50.12% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-19.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-771.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-97.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-236.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
384.28%
Equity/share CAGR of 384.28% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
73.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.59% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
22.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 22.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
31.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.76% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
11.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 11.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.01%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.48%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.47%
BV/share growth of 1.47% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 36.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.80%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.