PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.15%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-20.25%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.69%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-17.24%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.36%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.95%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-59.92%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 205.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-77.51%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 122.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-9.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 61.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
3.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 61.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
81.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 61.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
96.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 96.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
24.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.83% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
97.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 97.36% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
56.05%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 68.90%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-6.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 68.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1308.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 68.90%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
217.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 217.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1.99%
Equity/share CAGR of 1.99% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
12.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 12.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
63.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.26% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
17.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 17.88% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.81% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 20.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.69%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.64%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.43%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 6.00%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-4.97%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 16.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.