PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-22.75%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 103.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.74%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 103.66%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.91%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 103.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.77%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.00%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
1.80%
Dividend growth of 1.80% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-34.44%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 37.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.57%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 51.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
49.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 144.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
130.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 144.17%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
30.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
101.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 101.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
146.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 146.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
69.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
323.19%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 101.22% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1889.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 101.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
68.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 100.45%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
181.93%
Equity/share CAGR of 181.93% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
25.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 25.48% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
12.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 12.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
91.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.76% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
106.54%
Dividend/share CAGR of 106.54% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
88.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 88.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 38.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.29%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 10.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.11%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.92%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.93%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.