205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 17.80%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 17.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 145.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 145.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.25%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 127.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.44%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 121.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 123.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.21%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.72%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.46%
Dividend growth of 0.46% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
102.70%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
243.37%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 152.71%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
76.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 9.41%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 36.52%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
123.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 123.71% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
171.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 119.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-13.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
311.00%
Similar net income/share CAGR to MPWR's 286.80%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
66.06%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1043.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
11.12%
Below 50% of MPWR's 117.66%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
100.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 100.48% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
16.45%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.45% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
5.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 89.59%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
361.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.29% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
366.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 366.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 652488.96% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 44.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.68%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 1.22%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.34%
Under 50% of MPWR's 5.40%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 9.51%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-8.88%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 7.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.