PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.24%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-53.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-55.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-50.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-50.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-49.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.70%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.32%
Dividend growth of 31.32% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-14.67%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 48.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.44%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 338.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
169.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 90.21%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
27.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 59.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
54.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 36.08%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
75.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 75.33% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
48.49%
Below 50% of MPWR's 185.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-2.06%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
461.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 171.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-42.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 232.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
214.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
29.85%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1985.23%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
24.58%
Below 50% of MPWR's 127.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
32.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 46.80%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
655.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 655.09% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
330.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.35% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.40%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.01%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.96%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.03%
Under 50% of MPWR's 1.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.60%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
20.00%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.43%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.