PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.66%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.60%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.76%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.86%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-17.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.91%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.81%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.82%
Dividend growth of 6.82% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
4.17%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 279.60%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
6.33%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 786.05%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
160.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 29.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 60.49%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-7.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 23.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
168.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 404.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
26.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MPWR's 28.73%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
5.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 171.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
137.70%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 249.26%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
463.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 103.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-41.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 91.36%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
117.37%
Below 50% of MPWR's 4256.57%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
36.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 72.14%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
11.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 19.69%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2060.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2060.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
172.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 172.72% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
129.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.94% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-21.06%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 8.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.29%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.59%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 5.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.31%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-5.98%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.86%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.