PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 11.32%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
9.81%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 11.90%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
15.53%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 11.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
15.39%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 11.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
15.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.89%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
15.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 7.69%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 8.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.32%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.06%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 5.72%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
95.43%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
115.37%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
37.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 157.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 52.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
18.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 49.55%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
158.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 302.12%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
95.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
74.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-46.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 670.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
40.42%
Below 50% of MPWR's 169.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.42%
Below 50% of MPWR's 87.17%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
20.58%
Below 50% of MPWR's 221.97%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
5.27%
Below 50% of MPWR's 45.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-1.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 23.32%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1158.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1158.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth well above MPWR's 8.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.93%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 12.20%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.82%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.17%
75-90% of MPWR's 2.52%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-12.29%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 3.20%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.95%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 21.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.