PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.04%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.29%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 0.47%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
0.32%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 81.06%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
294.29%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 79.31%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 81.48%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.20%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MPWR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-42.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-45.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 190.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
47.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 117.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
27.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 63.82%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
134.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 119.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
247.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 110.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
94.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
178.55%
Similar net income/share CAGR to MPWR's 192.87%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
324.95%
Below 50% of MPWR's 656.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
121.24%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 241.90%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
45.75%
Below 50% of MPWR's 218.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.43%
Below 50% of MPWR's 74.76%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.04%
Below 50% of MPWR's 50.76%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
196.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 196.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 32.76%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
13.77%
AR growth well above MPWR's 26.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 12.71%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.77%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 7.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.16%
50-75% of MPWR's 6.07%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-0.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
5.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.