PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.70%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 12.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 12.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
4.57%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-1.29%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
17.55%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.84%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.61%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.70%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.54%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 41.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
102.12%
OCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 15.39%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
130.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 7.91%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
22.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 170.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 102.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 53.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
303.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 231.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
136.80%
Below 50% of MPWR's 583.64%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
103.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 120.05%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
136.66%
Below 50% of MPWR's 281.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
123.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 237.44%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
41.81%
Below 50% of MPWR's 85.39%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3.34%
Below 50% of MPWR's 175.21%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-15.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 111.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 65.33%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
638.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 638.34% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
162.46%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to MPWR's 174.93%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
79.33%
Below 50% of MPWR's 165.40%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-10.64%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 15.68%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 6.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.45%
Under 50% of MPWR's 3.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
3.76%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MPWR's 54.04%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.53%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 22.03%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-3.84%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 27.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.