PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.18%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 34.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.18%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 34.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.18%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 34.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.18%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 34.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
7.37%
Net income growth of 7.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
16.67%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 75.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 360.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
20.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 360.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 360.94%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
617.50%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
617.50%
Net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
617.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 617.50% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.