PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.63%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
137.71%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MU's 170.09%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
137.71%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MU's 170.09%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
-11.23%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-14.29%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1082.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1082.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
30.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1082.45%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
709.89%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
709.89%
Net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
709.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 709.89% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.