PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 25.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
171.79%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 14.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-1233.33%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1233.33%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-700.00%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-445.24%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-445.24%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while MU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 126.92%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
223.77%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 195.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
34.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 782.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 782.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 148.31%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-169.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
52.64%
Below 50% of MU's 173.30%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
52.64%
Below 50% of MU's 173.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
31.37%
Below 50% of MU's 363.95%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.45%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-3.32%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth of 10.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.