PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 17.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 25.40%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-217.14%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 88.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-217.14%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 88.54%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-190.74%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 76.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-160.00%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 76.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-160.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 76.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.49%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
402.45%
Dividend growth of 402.45% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-59.18%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
0.93%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 80.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 522.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
30.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 522.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 34.96%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1331.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1331.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-271.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
857.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 857.05% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
786.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 786.16% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.53%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 16.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-4.17%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.07%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19.44%
Debt growth far above MU's 11.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.77%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.