PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.21%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 14.67%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
21.35%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 3.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
103.17%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 55.00%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
103.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 55.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
80.00%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 150.00%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
66.67%
EPS growth of 66.67% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 66.67% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
30.34%
Share count expansion well above MU's 1.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
30.34%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 1.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-26.23%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
1562.50%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
163.89%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
44.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 587.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 329.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 5.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
461.80%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 461.80% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
43.62%
Net income/share CAGR of 43.62% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-30.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.48% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.37%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
25.69%
AR growth well above MU's 13.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.17%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
7.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-21.23%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.09%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.56%
SG&A growth well above MU's 2.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.