PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.34%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 2.26%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
0.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 3.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-9.38%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 19.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.38%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 19.35%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.83%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.00%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.76%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.76%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.40%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
131.58%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
319.57%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
59.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 357.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
38.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 286.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.99%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 168.99% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
5.29%
Net income/share CAGR of 5.29% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-18.74%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.02%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.37%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
70.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 70.37% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.72%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.81%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 0.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
SG&A growth well above MU's 3.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.