PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.18%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-54.96%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 7.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.89%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 8.16%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23.89%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 8.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.19%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.97%
Share count expansion well above MU's 1.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.97%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 1.73%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-10.10%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-70.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-120.49%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
36.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1192.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
10.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 101.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 86.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
616.08%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 616.08% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-18.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
456.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 456.75% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 33.94% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-18.09%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.28%
AR growth well above MU's 3.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.50%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 12.48%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.73%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.80%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 9.41%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.