PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.94%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 3.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
122.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 3.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
188.14%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 42.76%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
188.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 42.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
560.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 10.75%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
589.13%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 14.68%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 14.68%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while MU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.74%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.32%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-54.39%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 35.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.70%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 255.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
43.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1894.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-15.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MU stands at 493.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU stands at 119.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2204.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 333.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-32.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
39.09%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 39.09% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
104.35%
Below 50% of MU's 3028.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-7.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
Below 50% of MU's 365.19%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
63.10%
Below 50% of MU's 243.92%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
101.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.36% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-22.01%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
80.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.04% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.69%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 20.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.01%
50-75% of MU's 4.26%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.71%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 2.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.55%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.