PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.46%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 29.26%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
25.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 142.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
51.31%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 181.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
54.85%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 181.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
29.41%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 148.48%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
31.25%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 142.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 142.55%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 7.57%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.57%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 11.07%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2.76%
Dividend growth of 2.76% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
42.40%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
260.00%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 510.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MU stands at 106.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
77.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.39%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 150.39% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
64.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
310.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.52%
Below 50% of MU's 285.90%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
48.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 33.08%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
88.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.55% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
83.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.56% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
18.90%
AR growth well above MU's 22.90%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.49%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.37%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.36%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 26.29%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.02%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 21.84%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.