PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Negative revenue growth while MU stands at 11.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.87%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.68%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 17.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.68%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 17.44%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.71%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 29.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.18%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.45%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.02%
Dividend growth of 25.02% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.05%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 87.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.93%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
66.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 13.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
96.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 28.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.72%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
241.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 22.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
127.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
37.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
401.02%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 2.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
252.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.65%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 57.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
10.40%
Below 50% of MU's 23.41%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MU is at 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
361.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.20% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
355.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.42% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
294.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 294.10% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.89%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 18.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.21%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.70%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.50%
We have a declining book value while MU shows 1.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.63%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 6.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.